Rebuild The MNGOP
  • 2024 -2025 Recap
  • NOT Just About Otter Tail
  • Truth About Otter Tail
  • Need to Know
  • MNGOP: Correct the Docs
  • Major Party Litigation
  • Precinct Caucus
  • Secure Major Party Status
  • About Us
  • Facts
  • Party OR Power
  • SCC Summary 8/12/23
  • Contact Us
  • 2022
  • 2022 Evidence
    • Ottertail
  • Issues of Noncompliance
    • BPOU Issues
    • Noncompliance I
    • Noncompliance II
    • Delegate Lists
    • Bylaw Violations
    • NO AFFILIATES
  • Delegates fight for Party
    • Letters to Delegates
  • Party Finances
    • MN Campaign Finance Board
    • FEC Summaries
    • FEC Reports
    • MN CFB Summaries
  • 204b.44
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Rebuild The MNGOP

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • 2024 -2025 Recap
  • NOT Just About Otter Tail
  • Truth About Otter Tail
  • Need to Know
  • MNGOP: Correct the Docs
  • Major Party Litigation
  • Precinct Caucus
  • Secure Major Party Status
  • About Us
  • Facts
  • Party OR Power
  • SCC Summary 8/12/23
  • Contact Us
  • 2022
  • 2022 Evidence
    • Ottertail
  • Issues of Noncompliance
    • BPOU Issues
    • Noncompliance I
    • Noncompliance II
    • Delegate Lists
    • Bylaw Violations
    • NO AFFILIATES
  • Delegates fight for Party
    • Letters to Delegates
  • Party Finances
    • MN Campaign Finance Board
    • FEC Summaries
    • FEC Reports
    • MN CFB Summaries
  • 204b.44

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

The Chair of the DFL initiated & prevailed in litigation to create a path for removal of major part

The MN Supreme Court Established New Case Law about Major Party Status

The MNGOP must take Action to ensure the Party is not vulnerable to a loss of Major Party Status under MN Stat 200.02, Subd. 7. 

The refusal of the Party to address the issues raised by this statute demonstrates failed leadership.

This law is CLEAR - non compliance with MN Law, the Party Constitution and Party rules can lead to a loss of Major Party Status if any person in the state brings forward a claim.

The Court created a path for ANY individual to challenge major party status under new law 2

The MNGOP officers did not attempt to intervene to raise issues about the new law which could protect the Party from future attacks. There is a reported belief amongst State Exec and the Chair that the DFL would never take action against the MNGOP. Because of the leadership failure to even attempt to protect the party, members of the MNGOP attempted to intervene. The Court ignored the Republicans' arguments supporting intervention and the LMN Party's willingness to allow the intervention and, instead, supported the DFL's request to deny the participation of the Republicans. 

The loss of major party status is mandated if a party violates the new statute. Any action taken by the MNGOP or its subunits  that is not compliant with the law or the Party constitution and rules could result in automatic loss of major party status. 

This is NOT only possible, it is REQUIRED.

Downloads

website dfl v lmn Petition Pursuant to 204B.44 (pdf)

Download

website 24 02 14 mnsos response (pdf)

Download

website 24 02 14 LMN Response - Petition (1) (pdf)

Download

website lmn intervenor Motion - Intervene kaardal atty (pdf)

Download

website 24 02 16 A24-0216 Order jurisdiction (pdf)

Download

members of the republican party motion to intervene (pdf)

Download

24 02 21 MRPMN Jurisdictional Brief (pdf)

Download

24 02 26 Ken martin response opposing intervention (pdf)

Download

24 02 26 lmn not opposing intervention (pdf)

Download

24 03 01 denial of intervention A24-0216 Order (pdf)

Download

24 03 20 judges rec on LMNP (pdf)

Download

Copyright © 2025 Rebuild The MNGOP - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept